Environment Support Group ® Parisara Samrakshana Kendra
S-3, Rajashree Apartments,
18/57, Hulemalgi
Building, Chowkimath
1st Main Road, S. R. K.
Gardens, Sirsi
(Uttara Kannada Dt.),
Jayanagar, Bannerghatta Road,
Karnataka 581401
Bangalore 560 041. INDIA Tel:
91-8384-25139
Telefax: 91-80-6341977 Fax:
91-8384-27839
Email:
esg@bgl.vsnl.net.in Email:
appiko@vsnl.com
08 December 2000
PRESS RELEASE
Dandeli Dam
Public Hearing Postponed
2nd
Fraudulent EIA - Government must Reject MPC Project
The Scheduled Environmental Public Hearing on the Dandeli
Dam proposed across River Kali by Murdeshwar Power Corporation (MPC) was
postponed by the Deputy Commissioner of Uttara Kannada District on the grounds
that the Panel was incomplete. Over 300
people who had gathered at Dandeli in response to a Notification of the
Karnataka State Pollution Control Board were thus denied the opportunity of
being heard.
13 members of the 15 member panel constituted to oversee the
Hearing proceedings failed to turn up, even when six were from the local area
and others were government officials. That such a crucial Statutory Hearing
should be postponed at a great cost to the public exchequer and without
attaching any importance to hardships faced by people gathered from far and
wide, and on the grounds that the quorum was not adequate, is a matter that
must not be viewed lightly. The DC must
thoroughly investigate the reasons why the Panel was not present and make his
report public.
Outside the venue, workers of the Karnataka Power
Corporation Ltd. demanded that the project must not be given to the private
entity, MPC, as it was originally conceived by KPCL, and belonged to them. They attributed various reasons, including
complicity at high levels, for the Government of Karnataka handing over this
project to MPC. Of those who managed to raise their concerns over the din, complained
that persons known to have an opinion critical of the project were threatened
with dire consequences by men owing allegiance to the Project Developer. In fact the local villages that are directly
affected were afraid of participating in the proceedings due to such threats,
it was stated.
In our Press Release of 5th November 2000
(available with us on request or at http://web.estart.com/~esg),
we had demanded that yesterday's Hearing should be postponed indefinitely, as
the EIA forming the basis of discussion, prepared by Tata Energy Research
Institute (TERI, www.teriin.org), was
based on data that was "secondary and spurious". Considering yesterday's events, and the
manner in which the Hearing has been postponed, the Government of Karnataka
must clarify if this was an attempt to avoid embarrassment, having been exposed
earlier in August of supporting the same project through environmental
clearances, based on a plagiarised EIA produced by the international consulting
firm Ernst and Young (recently allied with Cap Gemini).
Whatever the explanations for yesterday's events, the
Karnataka Government is now bound to comply with Sec 4 of the Environment
Impact Assessment Notification (1994)of the Union Ministry of Environment and
Forests (available online at http://envfor.nic.in/) which reads:
"4. Concealing factual data or
submission of false, misleading data/reports, decisions or recommendations
would lead to the project being rejected. Approval, if granted earlier on the
basis of false data would also be revoked. Misleading and wrong information
will cover the following:
n
False information.
n
False data.
n
Engineered reports.
n
Concealing of factual data.
n
False recommendations or
decisions"
Murdeshwar Power Corporation, in its attempt to get its Rs.
180 crore dam project cleared as part of the Karnataka Government's Global
Investors Meet, ironically held on World Environment Day this year, has
attempted to secure environmental clearances,
Ø
First based on a plagiarised EIA
prepared by Ernst and Young, produced even before the project was officially
sanctioned on July 7th, and now,
Ø
producing an EIA prepared by TERI, that
contains "misleading and wrong information" which was produced in a
record time of a month!
There
is thus no option but for the Central and Karnataka Government to reject the
project application in accordance with the EIA Notification. Further, there is now
an heightened need to find out what conspired in attempting to push
environmental clearances for the MPC project.
To unravel which we reiterate our original demand for a judicial enquiry
into this project and the process of its clearances. Only by such an independent enquiry can those guilty of
complicity in violating basic precepts of environmental law be exposed.
Leo F. Saldanha/Bhargavi S. Rao Pandurang Hegde/Balachandra Hegde
Environment Support Group Parisara
Samrakshana Kendra
Bangalore Sirsi