Environment Support Group ®
Parisara
Samrakshana Kendra
S-3,
Rajashree Apartments, 18/57, Hulemalgi Building, Chowkimath
1st
Main Road, S. R. K. Gardens, Sirsi
(Uttara Kannada Dt.),
Jayanagar,
Bannerghatta Road, Karnataka 581401
Bangalore
560 041. INDIA Tel:
91-8384-25139
Telefax:
91-80-6341977 Fax: 91-8384-27839
Email: esg@bgl.vsnl.net.in Email:
appiko@vsnl.com
18 August 2000
PRESS RELEASE
Ernst
& Young Plagiarises EIA to push environmental clearance for Dandeli Dam
Project
Two completely
different rivers to be dammed. Two
completely different types of dams. Two
completely different forest types to be submerged. And, two completely different locations. Yet the "Rapid Environment Impact
Assessments" for both proposed projects are identical. Word for word, para to para, section to section,
and, except a few minor differences, the villages, the species, the
climatalogical data, the water and soil analysis, the sampling stations, are
all ABSOLUTELY THE SAME. How is this
possible?
Ask Ernst & Young
- the Knowledge Firm that proclaims from "Thought to Finish" they
hold the highest standards of Corporate Ethics. They have even conducted a "Fraud Survey" in
India. And Teleos and The KNOW Network in
their 1999 Most Admired Knowledge
Enterprises (MAKE) study, rated Ernst & Young 5th in a list
of 20 global majors. (Ref.: www.eyindia.com)
Ernst & Young,
"a company that recognizes environmental stewardship will yield benefits
to the environment while also reducing environmental risks and
liabilities", has in probably the worst case of fraud in environmental
decision making history in India, completely plagiarised the Rapid Environment
Impact Assessment of the Tattihalla Augmentation Scheme prepared by Institute
for Catchment Studies and Environmental Management, Bangalore, a study
conducted during September 1999. The
only Ernst & Young have cared to change is the name of the dam, DMH for
TAS.
DMH stands for
Dandeli Mini-Hydel Project proposed downstream of Supa Dam on Kali river. The project costs about Rs. 180 crores (US $
40 million approx.), and proposes construction of two saddle dams across Kali
river close to Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary and Ulvi Bird Sanctuary and involving
submergence of about 87 ha of moist deciduous and evergreen forests in the Uttara
Kannada district of Western Ghats, all to generate about 130 million units of
energy. This project of Murdeshwar
Power Corporation Ltd. (MPCL) was cleared on World Environment Day, June 5th,
2000, by the Government of Karnataka as part of its Global Investors Meet.
Per the Environment
Impact Assessment Notification, environmental clearances for the project has to
be on the basis of an Environmental Public Hearing conducted by the Karnataka
State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) and the Karnataka Environment
Department. The Karnataka Forest
Department, the Karnataka Industries Dept., and the Union Ministries for
Environment & Forests, and Power, have also to play their due role in
clearing the project.
MPCL was assured by
the Government of early clearances, if they managed an EIA. Ernst & Young promised to deliver the
same, at a cost, whatever that may be monetarily. And they achieved the same in a matter of days, and submitted it
in the very same month (June 2000).
This was possible because Ernst & Young plagiarised the REIA of the
Tattihalla dam project, which is proposed about 90 miles away, across the
Bedthi river (DMH is across Kali), and involves submergence of dry and moist
deciduous forests, mainly, with total submergence area being 564 ha (DMH
submerges 87 ha of moist deciduous and evergreen forests),….. We could go on
and on, about the species composition that is absolutely different, the
formation of the forests, the names of villages, the physical features, so on
and so forth.
In summary, excepting
5 original pages, much of the originality being description of the DMH project,
the 65 page REIA prepared by Ernst &
Young is an absolute copy of the REIA of the Tattihalla project. Shockingly, the DMH project did not even
exist when studies for the Tattihalla project were conducted.
On the basis of this
criminally fraudulent document, KSPCB
decided to hold a Environmental Public Hearing for the DMH project on 21 August
2000 giving 30 days notice by public advertisement. Initially the REIA was available for public
inspection, then disappeared, and has now reappeared as an Executive
Summary. We have compared documents of
both projects, and have absolute proof of Ernst &Young's fraud on the public
interest and the governance system.
Thus, there is no
doubt in our mind that any action less than the toughest is acceptable. Therefore, we demand that:
1.
The Proposed Public Hearing must be cancelled immediately.
2.
A Judicial Enquiry ordered into the incident to pin
responsibility within the Government for allowing this fraud.
3.
Disempanel Ernst & Young as EIA Consultant in India.
We make this appeal
in the wider Public Interest and in the interest of protecting the fast
depleting forest cover of the Western Ghats, one of 21 bio-diversity hotspots in
the world according to Conservation International.
Leo F.
Saldanha/Bhargavi S. Rao Pandurang Hegde/Balachandra Hegde
Environment Support
Group Parisara Samrakshana Kendra
Bangalore Sirsi
PS: We have copies of both REIA's for inspection
at our offices. In addition, we could
email on request the Executive Summary of the Ernst & Young REIA of
DMH. This release has been made based
on a detailed examination of all documents mentioned, and as well a site
reconnaissance by Parisara Samrakshana Kendra members.