Environment Support Group ®

S-3, Rajashree Apartments, 18/57, 1st Main Road, S. R. K. Gardens,

Jayanagar, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore 560041. INDIA

Telefax: 91-80-6341977/6531339

Email: [email protected]n Website: http://www.esgindia.org

 

 

Chairman

Central Pollution Control Board                                                                           

Ministry of Environment and Forests

Govt. Of India

Parivesh Bhawan

East Arjun Nagar

New Delhi – 110032

 

                                                                                                                        07 October 2003

 

Reg: Blatant violations of Environmental norms and standards by West coast Paper Mills and non-enforcement of penal provisions by the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board.

 

Dear Sir,

 

Please find enclosed a detailed report on the blatant violations of environmental norms, standards and statutory requirements by M/s West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka.  This report also implicates the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board for not acting as per law, despite various representations.

 

You are urged to take corrective action immediately.

 

Thank you,

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

Leo F. Saldanha/Rajmohan Pillai/Dr. Ananth Chikkatur     

Environment Support Group

 

Endorsed by:

 

Pandurang Hegde

Parisara Samrakshana Kendra

Sirsi

Sunita Dubey

Environmental Justice Initiative

New Delhi

 

 

Cc:

 

1.       Mr. S. M. Krishna, Chief Minister of Karnataka

2.       Mr. R. V. Deshpande, Karnataka Minister for Large and Medium Industries

3.       Mr. Pradipto Ghosh, Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests

4.       Dr. Nalini Bhat, Director, Ministry of Environment and Forests

5.       Chief Conservator of Forests, Southern Regional Office, Ministry of Environment and Forests

6.       Principal Secretary, Karnataka Dept. for Ecology, Environment and Forests

7.       Secretary, Karnataka Dept. for Ecology and Environment

8.       Chairman, Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

Major issues of Non-compliance with
 
Environmental Norms and Regulations by
 
West Coast paper Mills
Dandeli, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka

 

Report Submitted to

 

Chairman, Central Pollution Control Board

 

 

Prepared by

 

Environment Support Group (Bangalore)

 

For

 

Kali Bachao Andolan

 

 

Endorsed by

 

Parisara Samrakshana Kendra (Sirsi)

and

Environmental Justice Initiative (New Delhi)

 

07 October 2003


 

Production

 

West Coast Paper Mills, a public limited company, has from as early as 1994 been producing far in excess of consented quantity per Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) clearances.  In its annual environmental audit statements to the KSPCB, for a period from 1998 to 2002, the company has claimed installed capacity as 1,19,750 tonnes per annum (TPA) while the KSPCB records show consent for production of only 85,500 TPA. In spite of this violation, the KSPCB retroactively, and thus illegally and controversially, approved WCPM’s production capacity to 1,19,500 TPA in 2002. In addition, the KSPCB has consented to further expansion and a tacit admission to this effect is contained in the Consent for Establishment letter No. KSPCB/CFE-CELL/DEO/AEO-1/WCPM/2001-2002/10 dated 06 April 2002, and the relevant sections are highlighted.  A copy of this letter is annexed at Annexure A.

 

 

Environmental Impact Assessment report

 

Per the aforementioned letter, the legally allowed production capacity of the paper mill is 85,500 tpa, whereas the company’s EIA report prepared by Tata Consultancy Service submitted in August 2000 in application for expansion to the KSPCB, is based on an increase from 1,19,750 TPA to 1,63,500 TPA. There is no EIA study carried out on the increase in production from 85,500 TPA to 1,19,750 TPA.

 

Legally it is required that the EIA study be carried out for the entire expansion program and not a part of it. Hence West Coast paper mill should be asked to carry out a new EIA study for expansion from 85,500 tpa to 1,63,500 tpa, pending which the company should be forced to back down its production to the consented limit, given compliance with other applicable conditions.

 

The Southern Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests conducted a detailed review of the WCPM environmental compliance record, and found the company wanting in most respects.  The illegal production expansion issue has been dealt with in detail, and extract of this report is annexed at Annexure B.

 

 

“No Increase in Pollution Load” Certificate Suspect:

 

KSPCB has certified vide its letter No. KSPCB/WPC/WESTCOAST/TC-17CAT/2002-03/307 dated 17 July 2002, that there would be no increase in the pollution load if the company increases production from 85,550 TPA to 163500 TPA. This certificate was sought by the company to seek exemption of environmental clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests.

 

It must be highlighted here that the no-increase-in-pollution-load claim of WCPM is wholly suspect, especially considering that the plant has doubled production illegally. That even their claim was entertained by the KSPCB without sufficient verification, and further, has even issued a certificate, is absolutely untenable and must be revoked. A copy of the aforementioned certificate is annexed at   Annexure C.

 

Clearly the motive here is to dodge the requirement of full environmental clearance per EIA Notification of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. In the absence of any reliable study, especially given that the past five years compliance statements by the company are of very poor quality and involve highly deceptive reporting, and also considering that the KSPCB has not independently monitored the situation carefully, as required, the Precautionary Principle must be invoked.  Consequently action must be caused to force the company to comply with the full environmental clearance process as required per law.

 

 

Water Pollution

 

WCPM releases its effluents into the Halamaddi Nalla, which joins the Kali River half a kilometer from the mill at Dandeli. The effluents are not treated before discharge into the river and have been found to be grossly exceeding various parameters prescribed.  The Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) Regional Office in Bangalore conducted a thorough study during January 2003, and fully validates this contention.

 

The absence of an effective effluent treatment system in the plant is basic evidence that the effluents can never match the standards set by State and Central authorities. Untreated paper effluents pollute the Kali River and have caused serious health problems to all life that depend on the Kali for water, for decades.

 

KSPCB has in its occasional studies over the past three years found the effluent not conforming to standards prescribed. It has served notices on the company on a couple of occasions vide letter Nos. 2630 and 754-55 dated 23.01.02 and 08.07.02 respectively. The company has demonstrated little regard to these notices, and continues to discharge the effluent without required treatment into the river.

 

During the CPCB inspection in January 2003 it was found that the mill was discharging insufficiently “treated“ effluents in excess of allowed quantities (almost twice as much) into the Kali River. In addition, CPCB found that the flow meters installed by the WCPM is faulty both at the intake and outfall points. Sections of the CPCB report relating to this aspect are annexed at Annexure D.

 

It has also been established by a December 1999 Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) study, commissioned by the company to assess the possibility of ground water contamination, that a one-kilometer stretch of the Kali River has indeed been adversely affected.  Ground water contamination in villages situated along the river is reported. A copy of the report was forwarded to KSPCB, but no action seems to have been taken till date. Copy of this letter No. EOS/EIA/99 dated December 13, 1999 is annexed at Annexure E.

 

A Legal Water Sample report of the KSPCB shows no conformance with required standards and a copy of this report No.88 dated 10/7/03 is annexed at Annexure F.

 

 

Upgradation of the Effluent treatment plant

 

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) pointed out the inadequacy in the effluent treatment system in the August 2000 EIA report that it supplied to company.  It was suggested that the system be upgraded immediately, and should include an appropriate Activated Sludge Process (ASP). The company has dodged this issue till date. 

 

The controversial support of KSPCB to the expansion application involves a clear requirement that the company shall have a new effluent treatment system ready by September 30th 2003. This deadline has been abrogated, and yet no action has been initiated as required per law till date.  It is to be noted that various enquiries suggest that this new system is several month’s away from completion.

 

It would be imperative for KSPCB then to follow its legal commitment and shut down the plant.  Instead, the company is continued to run the plant and discharge untreated effluents into the river, to the illegally expanded capacity.  This is posing increased risks to public health and environment, which could be accentuated due to low flow of the river in a drought year. A copy of the KSPCB letter No. KSPCB/DEO(17CAT)/AEO/203-04/ 565 dated 6 June 2003 indicating the deadline is annexed at Annexure G.

 

Representations made on this issue

 

Chief minister, Government of Karnataka

 

A representation was made to the Chief minister on 6th June 2003, as part of a networked initiative, the Kali Bachao Andolan (KBA).  This resulted in the CM directing the Secretary, Karnataka Department of Ecology and Environment for a report on the matter. The Secretary in turn asked for a report from the Chairman, KSPCB. This report, which was to be supplied by July, is yet to be submitted.  A copy of the Representation made to the Chief Minister and the subsequent order of the Secretary is enclosed at Annexure H and H-1.

 

Chairman , Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

 

There have been several meetings with KSPCB official with regard to the pollution from WCPM.  On 23 August 2003, various representatives of KBA met with the Chairman, Mr. J. Alexander, and his attention was drawn to the issue.  A letter dated 23 August 2003 highlighting significant issues was submitted and the same is enclosed at Annexure J. 

 

In particular the serious incident of pollution due to discharge of untreated effluents on 29/30 June 2003, and the consequent impact, was brought to his attention.  That a newborn infant died after consuming its mother’s milk who suffered gastroenteritis along with 50 others from Kariampalli village immediately downstream from the discharge point, was highlighted.  It was also brought to the Chairman’s attention that a 27-year-old man suffered acute renal failure on account of neglect from the district and company authorities in responding to this crisis. 

 

Various options to provide a permanent relief to villagers were discussed, but as yet no remedial action has been affected. 

 

To press the matter further, the Chairman was met again on 19th September 2003, by a wider delegation of Kali Bachao Andolan.  This time he was pressed to initiate action if the company was not showing evidence of complying with the 30 September 2003 deadline to install the effluent treatment plant.  Chairman offered to make a site visit to assess the situation, and in the meantime promised that he would instruct the company to provide remedies to affected communities. It was also bought to his notice that people raising pollution issues were under threat from the company. He said that this was a very serious matter and the Board would not tolerate such high-handed behavior from anyone.

 

 

R.V. Deshpande, Minister for Large and Medium Industry, Government of Karnataka

 

Affected people and their representatives met the Minister on the 19th September and apprised the Minister of the prevailing situation in Dandeli. They spoke at length about the problems they faced due to the discharge of untreated effluents into the Kali River. The Minister admitted that the mill should have upgraded their effluent treatment plant long back, but had not done so.

 

He also instructed the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Zilla Panchayat, Uttara Kannada, to conduct a detailed health survey on the impact of pollution on the immediately affected four villages downstream of the discharge point.  This study is now underway per an order of the CEO dated 24 September 2003. This report is due anytime now.

 

Kanhiya Lal Chandak , Executive Director, West Coat paper Mills

 

On 30th September, the day of the company’s Annual General meeting, villagers from Kariampalli, worst affected by the recent pollution by WCPM, along with representatives of Environment Support Group, Parisara Samrakshana Kendra, Alternative Law Forum and Samvada, as part of the KBA network entered in protest the WCPM campus.  Individual investors were met with and encouraged to force their company to comply with environmental norms and statutory requirements.  The participants later secured a meeting with Mr. K. L. Chandak, Executive Director, West Coast Paper Mills and his senior managers.

 

In this meeting he was asked to respond to a number of queries and violations of law. Some of the issues raised during the discussion were.

 

§         Willful negligence by WCPM causing serious pollution of the Kali River, and its ecology.  Also that of extracting water from Kali River far in excess of consented quantities, by tampering with water meters, both at the intake and discharge points.

§         Causing grievous injury and harm to villagers downstream of the effluent discharge point.

§         Criminal neglect of villagers affected by the pollution incident on 29/30 June 2003.  Also of not providing drinking water facilities despite the pollution of surface and underground aquifers being reported to be serious for a decade now.

§         Lax approach to statutory warnings requiring the company to install a state of the art effluent treatment plant.  This involved violation of a key direction requiring the treatment plant to be ready by 30 September.  Further, carelessly discharging fly ash from the power plant, including in a local college campus.

§         Gross violation of production limits set, as the company was on record that it was producing more than twice the consented quantity.  This resulted in more fresh water intake, and doubling of pollution, with consequent adverse impacts on public health and environment. 

§         The company has wrongly claimed that this increase in production will not increase the pollution load, in an attempt to dodge compliance with a full environmental review requiring public involvement.    The past five years’ environmental compliance reports filed by the company with the Karnataka Pollution Control Board has too many factual inaccuracies and is a copy-paste job across the years.  It appears the regulatory authority has colluded with the company by not examining such details and taking appropriate action.

§         The company was behaving in a manner as to threaten the local communities with dire action if they questioned the company’s errant behaviour.

 

During the hour -long meeting with the affected villagers Mr. Chandak promised that WCPM will undertake the expenses of providing drinking water to all villages affected by pollution of Kali due to discharge of effluents. Additionally the company will invest in a mobile medical unit to provide immediate health relief to affected villages. Further, WCPM will accept monetary claims from all affected families and these claims would include cost of loss of income and livelihood due to disease, death and disease of cattle and failure of crops. He emphatically asserted that the company would comply with all regulations. He also confirmed that the production would move towards elemental-chlorine free process in the near future especially if the country’s laws required it to. He also added that the company is in the process of applying for ISO 14001 certification.

 

 

Press reports

 

The wide concerns over the utter lack of compliance with statutory requirements and the adverse impacts on the local health and environment have been consistently reported in the press.  A selection of such reports is annexed at Annexure K.

 

Also enclosed is photographic evidence of the nature of the impact, and of protest actions that have been initiated to bring the company to book. This is annexed at Annexure K-1

 

END OF REPORT